Skip to contents

Flags a License that tools::analyze_license() cannot standardize, and a + file LICENSE pointing at a file that does not exist. For MIT and the BSD licenses it also reads that file as R CMD check does: it must be the stub of YEAR and COPYRIGHT HOLDER fields (and ORGANIZATION for BSD 3-clause), so the full license text in its place is reported, as R's "License stub is invalid DCF" NOTE.

Usage

lab_license(path = ".", verbose = TRUE, desc = NULL)

Arguments

path

Character. Path to the package directory. Default: ".".

verbose

Logical. Print diagnostic output. Default: TRUE.

desc

Optional pre-parsed DESCRIPTION, as returned by base::read.dcf(). Defaults to reading it from path.

Value

checktor_check_result() with passed, issues, message.

Source

The CRAN Repository Policy treats an invalid or unrecognised License field as a rejection. See vignette("check-sources", package = "checktor") for how every check maps to its source.

See also

checktor(), which runs this and every other check.

Examples

pkg <- example_diagnose_scenario("description_examples/license_bad.txt",
                                 show_content = FALSE)
lab_license(pkg, verbose = FALSE)$issues
#> [1] "License 'Free to use' is not a standardizable CRAN license"
unlink(pkg, recursive = TRUE)